Rtx 3060 Vs Rtx 2070 Super
Price now 701$ Games supported 100% Price now 441$ Games supported 100% Comparing of graphics carte du jour architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To go the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General functioning parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing procedure, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of functioning, but for precise assessment yous have to consider their criterion and gaming exam results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other calculator components. Useful when choosing a future reckoner configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it'southward interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, autobus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors accept no dedicated VRAM and utilise a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the menu itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will bear witness useful if you demand some particular technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including detail versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark functioning rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, merely if y'all find some perceived inconsistencies, experience free to speak upwardly in comments section, we usually set issues quickly. This is probably the most ubiquitous criterion, role of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four split up benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, 10, xi and 12 (the final being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. Information technology taxes the graphics carte du jour with ii scenes, one depicting a daughter escaping some militarized base located within a bounding main cave, the other displaying a space armada attack on a caught planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Criterion coverage: 17% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on 2 scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark xi is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX eleven characteristic level ten benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. But like Ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Nighttime Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% Criterion coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX xi benchmark for gaming PCs. Information technology features 2 dissever tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery beast seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from xi dissimilar examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle betwixt two space fleets well-nigh a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Nighttime Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% Geekbench v is a widespread graphics bill of fare criterion combined from xi unlike test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Geekbench v is a widespread graphics carte du jour benchmark combined from 11 different examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 5% Benchmark coverage: 2% Permit's see how skilful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Item gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large ready of popular games across different resolutions: +82.5% −82.5% −xv.ix% +15.nine% +107% −107% +216% −216% +2.vi% −2.6% −14.8% +14.8% −25% +25% +205% −205% +209% −209% −27.ix% +27.9% +105% −105% −4.seven% +iv.7% +2.viii% −2.8% +57.9% −57.9% −fourteen.9% +xiv.9% +80.7% −80.7% +144% −144% +4% −iv% −12.nine% +12.9% −22.3% +22.three% +202% −202% +170% −170% −25.three% +25.3% +7.4% −vii.4% +17.five% −17.5% −2.5% +2.5% +4.1% −iv.1% +1.one% −ane.one% +14% −14% −13.6% +xiii.6% +66.vii% −66.7% +12.v% −12.5% −11.9% +eleven.ix% −17.2% +17.2% +168% −168% +34.ii% −34.2% +fifteen.3% −15.3% +66.seven% −66.7% +77.2% −77.two% −22.2% +22.2% +10% −10% −29.5% +29.v% +2.five% −2.5% +0% +0% −thirteen.2% +13.2% +45.6% −45.vi% +20.v% −20.v% −ane.1% +ane.1% −iii.5% +3.v% +119% −119% +13.3% −13.three% −3.6% +iii.6% −3.6% +3.6% −13.5% +xiii.five% +12.v% −12.v% −104% +104% +2.iii% −2.3% +6.iii% −vi.iii% −46.two% +46.2% −18.8% +18.8% −7.5% +7.5% +22.2% −22.2% +12.5% −12.v% +12% −12% +47.4% −47.4% +7.4% −7.4% Technical Urban center couldn't make up one's mind between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 The differences in operation seem likewise small. Should you still have questions concerning selection betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Practice you think nosotros are right or mistaken in our pick? Vote by clicking "Similar" button near your favorite graphics card. The nearest GeForce RTX 2070 Super'southward AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6700 XT, which is faster by 4% and higher by 7 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2070 Super: Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 3060 from AMD is Radeon RX 5700 XT, which is slower past 1% and lower past 3 positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3060: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with operation more or less close to those reviewed, providing yous with more options to consider. Here you tin can see the user rating of the graphics cards, too as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of i to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to five: Here you can enquire a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or study an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSRTX 2070 Super vs RTX 3060
Full general info
Place in performance rating 38 46 Value for money 29.07 45.12 Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Ampere (2020−2022) GPU lawmaking proper noun Turing TU104 Ampere GA106 Market place segment Desktop Desktop Release date 2 July 2019 (3 years ago) 12 January 2021 (1 year ago) Launch price (MSRP) $499 $329 Price now $701 (1.4x MSRP) $441 (ane.3x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2560 3584 Core clock speed 1605 MHz 1320 MHz Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1777 MHz Number of transistors 13,600 million xiii,250 million Manufacturing process applied science 12 nm 8 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 215 Watt 170 Watt Texture fill rate 283.two 199.0 Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe iii.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 Length 267 mm 242 mm Width 2-slot two-slot Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pivot + 1x eight-pin 1x 12-pin Memory
Memory blazon GDDR6 GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB Retentiveness double-decker width 256 Fleck 192 Fleck Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 15000 MHz Memory bandwidth 448.0 GB/due south 360.0 GB/due south Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort HDMI + + Yard-SYNC support + no information Technologies
API support
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_2) Shader Model 6.5 half dozen.5 OpenGL four.6 four.half-dozen OpenCL 1.two two.0 Vulkan one.two.131 1.two CUDA 7.5 8.6 Benchmark operation
Overall score
Gaming operation
Full Hard disk 138 124 1440p 92 78 4K 64 50 Full Hd
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 80 79 Total HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104 55−60 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88 102 Battlefield 5 118 55−lx Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180 55−lx Cyberpunk 2077 80 78 Far Cry 5 122 140 Far Cry New Dawn 96 120 Forza Horizon 4 174 55−sixty Hitman 3 176 55−sixty Horizon Zero Dawn 111 142 Carmine Dead Redemption 2 117 55−60 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127 133 Watch Dogs: Legion 111 108 Total HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90 55−threescore Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 74 85 Battlefield v 103 55−60 Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 139 55−60 Cyberpunk 2077 78 75 Far Cry 5 116 131 Far Cry New Dawn 94 115 Forza Horizon four 172 55−60 Hitman 3 154 55−60 Horizon Zero Dawn 87 109 Metro Exodus 87 81 Blood-red Dead Redemption 2 67 55−lx Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118 121 The Witcher iii: Wild Chase 178 171 Watch Dogs: Legion 96 95 Full Hard disk
Ultra Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 65 55−60 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66 75 Battlefield 5 95 55−60 Cyberpunk 2077 72 64 Far Cry 5 109 122 Far Weep New Dawn 87 102 Forza Horizon four 153 55−60 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 73 Watch Dogs: Legion 68 59 1440p
Loftier Preset
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95 55−sixty Hitman 3 101 55−threescore Horizon Nil Dawn 63 77 Metro Exodus 55 l Ruby Dead Redemption 2 44 55−60 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82 80 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 57 55−60 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53 sixty Battlefield 5 83 55−60 Cyberpunk 2077 47 39 Far Weep 5 93 94 Far Weep New Dawn 86 89 Forza Horizon iv 125 55−lx Lookout Dogs: Legion 51 45 4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55 55−60 Hitman 3 55 55−60 Horizon Zero Dawn 37 42 Metro Exodus 36 32 Red Dead Redemption 2 28 55−60 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44 43 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 67 63 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 39 55−60 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 32 38 Battleground 5 53 55−60 Cyberpunk 2077 22 18 Far Cry five 54 48 Far Cry New Dawn 56 50 Forza Horizon 4 84 55−60 Sentry Dogs: Legion 29 27 Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating 61.28 57.26 Novelty 2 July 2019 12 January 2021 Cost $499 $329 Retentivity double-decker width 256 192 Memory bandwidth 448 360 Pipelines / CUDA cores 2560 3584 Chip lithography 12 nm viii nm Thermal pattern power (TDP) 215 Watt 170 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2070 Super past AMD
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3060 by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2070-Super-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060
0 Response to "Rtx 3060 Vs Rtx 2070 Super"
Post a Comment